Marchés publics: faut-il réformer les méthodes de notation des critères d’attribution ?

François Maréchal and Pierre-Henri Morand

Revue d'économie politique, 2022, vol. 132, issue 5, 697-722

Abstract: This article analyzes the methods of selecting the most economically advantageous tender in public procurement. It has two objectives. Firstly, it evaluates the properties of the relative bid evaluation formulas used in practice for the criteria for selecting the bids. Through examples, it underlines that these bid evaluation formulas turn out to be rather arbitrary, manipulable, and do not reveal the preferences of public purchasers. The article then presents the steps for the construction of a scoring rule allowing to put bidders in competition in a transparent way by choosing for each criterion a bid evaluation formula and a weighting that reflect the preferences of the public buyer. Classification JEL: D44; D82; H57

Keywords: Public procurement; multi-criteria award; bid evaluation formulas; scoring rules (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H57 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=REDP_325_0697 (application/pdf)
http://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-politique-2022-5-page-697.htm (text/html)
free

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cai:repdal:redp_325_0697

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Revue d'économie politique from Dalloz
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (operations@cairn.info).