The Efficiency of the Currency Board Arrangement
Nikola Fabris () and
Gojko Rodić ()
Additional contact information
Nikola Fabris: The Chief Economist,Central Bank of Montenegro and Professor, Faculty of Economics University of Belgrade
Gojko Rodić: Slobomir P University,Bijeljina
Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 2013, vol. 2, issue 1, 157-176
Abstract:
The currency board arrangement has a relatively long history and it originated in the British colonies. In the period after the World War II, the interest in this arrangement died down, but it was revived with the initiation of the transition process in Eastern Europe, when the number of countries in this arrangement increased. The currency board arrangement has an influence on fast disinflation, but there is a dilemma about its performance in relatively stable conditions. The purpose of this paper is to make the comparison of selected performance (inflation and the current account deficit) of countries under the currency board arrangement with countries using other exchange rate arrangements, relying on the example of European economies in transition. This paper confirms assumptions of the theory that countries under the floating exchange rate arrangement have the lowest current account deficits (measured as a percentage of GDP), while the countries under the currency board arrangement have significantly higher deficits. Contrary to expectations, it turned out that the rate of inflation is lower in countries under the floating exchange rate arrangement when compared to other countries under the currency board arrangement, which indicates a lower efficiency of this arrangement in a stable environment.
Keywords: the currency board; inflation; the current account deficit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F31 F32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cbcg.me/repec/cbk/journl/vol2no1-8.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cbk:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:1:p:157-176
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice from Central bank of Montenegro Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().