IMPORTANCE OF MAKING STRATEGIC DECISIONS IN COUNTRIES IN TRANSITION AND CONNECTION WITH THE ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY GENERALLY SPEAKING

Slobodan Popovic, Jelena Toskovic, Zeljko Grubljesic, Ranko Mijic and Dragan Đuranovic
Additional contact information
Slobodan Popovic: KP GRADSKO ZELENILO, SUTJESKA 2, 2100 NOVI SAD, SERBIA
Jelena Toskovic: AD MLEKARA SABAC, KRSMANOVACA BB, 15000 SABAC, SERBIA
Zeljko Grubljesic: PENSION FUND, OFFICE OF PRIJEDOR, VOZDA KARADORDA 2, 79101 PRIJEDOR, BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA
Ranko Mijic: COLLEGE OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS PRIJEDOR, STREET MITROPOLITA PETRA ZIMONJICA BB, 79000 PRIJEDOR, BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA
Dragan Đuranovic: UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD, FACULTY OF ECONOMICS IN SUBOTICA, SERBIA

Annals - Economy Series, 2016, vol. 2, 98-103

Abstract: The accession of a number of transition countries of the EU, such as the Republic of Serbia, essentially means the adoption of strategic decisions at the state level in the context of wider EU decision. The authors based their observations on the EU 2020 strategy, which is essentially defined as: smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. The EU has adopted the basic principles of 2010, with the main objective to economic growth throughout the EU based on knowledge, but with respect for the principles of environmental protection, increasing employment, and increase in other basic principles of economics of the company to the state. You could say that the entire system such observations cohesion productivity growth economies of EU member states and social cohesion and socially responsible behavior. This approach was incurred because there is a need of constant adjustment economies member changes at the global level. Notwithstanding the universal adaptation of all EU member states, however, one part remained reserved for a special adjustment of each member country (it depends on the specific characteristics of each country to adapt) in accordance with national goals adopted by any government of a Member State specifically for your country, through national development plans, plans of adjustment and reform plans. The consequences of the Great Depression are highly visible and in early 2016, particularly in terms of rising unemployment, rising unemployment especially of young people in all old EU member states. The responsibility for this state of affairs is not only the governments of member states, but responsibility must be sought from the representatives of big business, trade unions, associations, non-governmental organizations and all other stakeholders who have imposed in the decision-making processes, and in a crisis to minimize its impact, because it does not response. At the end of the aforementioned macro effects should be seen in the context of sustainable-environmental management, because then it brings a new quality.

Keywords: European Union; strategic management; ecology; development. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2016-02/12_Slobodan,%20Mijic.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2016:v:2:p:98-103

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Annals - Economy Series from Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ecobici Nicolae ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).