Usucapio After the Enforcement of the Law No. 7/1996

Rodica Peptan
Additional contact information
Rodica Peptan: Constantin Brâncusi University of Târgu-Jiu

Annals - Juridical Science Series, 2009, vol. 2, 153-168

Abstract: In the context of contrary opinions in literature and juridical practice created upon the survival of previous real estate advertising systems for a while, the legislative intervention from 2005 through which Law no. 7/1996 was amended and especially the intervention of H.C.C.J. which decided to end the enforcement of previous real estate advertising systems after the enforcement of the Law. no. 7/1996, were not enough to provide a unitarian vision on the problem of usucapio started before, but not accomplished by the enforcement of the Law. no. 7/1996 or fulfilled but not judicially called, respectively not registered in the land registry on the acquirer’s name, in the case of extra-tabular usucapio, up to this moment.

Keywords: aquisitive prescription; usucapion; Law no. 7/1996; New Civil Code (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/jur/pdf/2009-02/13_RODICA_PEPTAN.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cbu:jrnlju:y:2009:v:2:p:153-168

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Annals - Juridical Science Series from Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Juridical Sciences Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Trocan Laura Magdalena ().