Don’t Double Down on the CPP: Expansion Advocates Understate the Plan’s Risks

William Robson

C.D. Howe Institute Backgrounder, 2011, issue 137

Abstract: Advocates of an expanded Canada Pension Plan as a response to Canadian concerns about low incomes in retirement too often promote it as a plan with guaranteed benefits that are fully funded. The CPP looks like a defined-benefit plan, but it is not. Most of its benefits are targets contingent on its financial condition, and past and upcoming revisions – including lower pensions for those taking them up before age 65 in both the CPP and its sister Quebec Pension Plan – show that governments can change the targets. Adverse economics and demographics, combined with disappointing investment returns, are now forcing the Quebec Pension Plan to trim benefits and raise contributions. The same has happened to the CPP, and too few Canadians realize it is likely to happen again. The CPP is a gamble, not a guarantee: expanding the plan would raise the stakes on a bet most Canadians do not know they have made.

Keywords: Pension Papers; Canada Pension Plan (CPP); defined-benefit plan; Quebec Pension Plan (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H55 H75 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cdhowe.org/don%E2%80%99t-double-down-c ... 2%80%99s-risks/13661 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdh:backgr:137

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in C.D. Howe Institute Backgrounder from C.D. Howe Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kristine Gray ().