The Laws of Unintended Consequence: The Effect of Labour Legislation on Wages and Strikes
Benjamin Dachis () and
Additional contact information
Robert Hebdon: McGill University
C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, 2010, issue 304
When politicians consider intervening in labour disputes, they should also consider the long-term, potentially unintended results of such action. In this study, the authors investigate the lessons from previous government legislative interventions, whether through compulsory arbitration, “back-to-work” legislation or bans on replacement workers during strikes, and find these actions have unintended results that give reason for sober second thought.
Keywords: Economic Growth and Innovation; Canadian federal and provincial governments; labour relations; compulsory arbitration; back-to-work legislation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J38 J52 J58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cdhowe.org/public-policy-research/laws ... on-wages-and-strikes (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdh:commen:304
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in C.D. Howe Institute Commentary from C.D. Howe Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kristine Gray ().