Rethinking royalty Rates: Why There Is a Better Way to Tax Oil and Gas Development

Colin Busby, Benjamin Dachis () and Bev Dahlby ()
Additional contact information
Colin Busby: C.D. Howe Institute

C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, 2011, issue 333

Abstract: When provinces raise royalties charged on oil and gas production, the result can be less, not more tax revenues. The authors show how resource-rich provinces would be better off relying more on auctions for exploration and development rights and relying less on royalties levied on output. Oil and gas taxation in Canada consists of two main elements: an auction payment and royalties that apply to the value of resources extracted. The authors examine the results of Alberta’s short-lived decision, in 2007, to increase royalty rates on oil and gas production. Accounting for differences in bonus bids across provinces in the same geological zones, the authors report that Alberta government revenue, collected through bonus bids, declined by nearly as much as the projected increase in royalty payments.

Keywords: Fiscal and Tax Competitiveness; Province of Alberta; oil and gas royalties; tax revenues (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H23 L71 L78 Q38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cdhowe.org/rethinking-royalty-rates-wh ... -and-gas-development (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdh:commen:333

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in C.D. Howe Institute Commentary from C.D. Howe Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kristine Gray ().