 Spendthrifts and Savers: Are Canadians Acting Like they are “House Poor” or “House Rich”?C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, 2017, issue 482 Abstract: Are Canadians acting like they are “house poor” and scrimping on spending in other parts of their lives because of what they pay for homes? What is interesting about this question is the fact that Canadian monthly mortgage bills, measured by the mortgage debt-service ratio, are approximately the same in size as they have been historically. The issue with a flat mortgage debt-servicing ratio, however, is it masks debt composition between interest and principal. With interest rates near zero, it is more likely that rates will rise in the future, causing an increase in mortgage debt-servicing costs. Furthermore, as we are more than seven years removed from the last recession, and there are strong arguments to suggest we have a housing-market bubble in our largest cities, there is additional risk of a negative economic shock. A high-leverage environment would exacerbate this situation. Using Statistics Canada mortgage-debt data broken down between interest and principal, my results suggest that Canadian households, on aggregate, have not slowed non-housing consumption due to this riskier debt environment. Furthermore, households have spent out of accumulated housing wealth, suggesting the removal of a buffer, potentially worsening any negative economic shock should house values fall. While these results are concerning, I find a lack of consumption sensitivity to increases in total debtservicing costs. The implication is that the risk to Canadian households comes more from a negative economic shock than from rising interest rates that raise monthly mortgage payments. From a policymaking perspective, the Bank of Canada can use these results to help model the economy now and into the future given current debt dynamics. Being prepared for a potentially larger consumption impact from a negative economic shock is prudent. Governments at all levels should continue to monitor the effectiveness of their demand-side policies while considering what supply-side policies may be more appropriate in slowing down housing prices and cheap credit growth, thereby lowering debt loads. Options for the government to consider include the balancing of environmental concerns with housing supply growth, pricing the use of infrastructure, and making the application process for development more efficient and transparent. Keywords: Financial; Services; and; Regulation (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdh:commen:482 Access Statistics for this article More articles in C.D. Howe Institute Commentary from C.D. Howe Institute Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.