 The robustness of cross-country healthcare rankings among homogeneous OECD countriesRichard Gearhart
Journal of Applied Economics, 2016, vol. 19, 113-144 Abstract: This paper re-examines analyses of cross-country healthcare efficiency using modern, non-parametric estimators and Malmquist indices to determine productivity changes over the panel. This paper finds that cross-country heterogeneity leads to different efficiency rankings than previously thought, and that the hyperbolic order-α estimator leads to more robust efficiency scores when looking across different output measures, only looking at the more homogeneous OECD countries. It finds that the United States, if excluding the percent of healthcare expenditures that are publicly financed, is one of the more inefficient healthcare delivery systems in the world. What are commonly thought of as well-run healthcare systems (Austria and France) are either inefficient themselves or have variation in their efficiency rankings, showcasing difficulties in using other countries’ healthcare systems as models for reform. It also finds that there has been productivity regression in all countries except the United States. These highlight the difficulties in cross-country efficiency comparisons. Keywords: United States healthcare; production efficiency; order- α; DEA; OECD (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cem:jaecon:v:19:y:2016:n:1:p:113-144 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Applied Economics is currently edited by Germán Coloma and Mariana Conte Grand and Jorge M. Streb More articles in Journal of Applied Economics from Universidad del CEMA Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.