Chapter 4: Markets, Policies, and Structural Change during and after the Covid Crisis

Torben M. Andersen, Giuseppe Bertola, Clemens Fuest, Cecilia Garcia-Penalosa, Harold James, Jan-Egbert Sturm and Branko Uroševic

EEAG Report on the European Economy, 2020, 21-26

Abstract: After the emergency responses and as the health shock appears to be under reasonable control, policy makers should turn to an evaluation of the measures that have been put in place. Some of the crisis responses, although crucial in the emergency, hamper the reallocation of economic activity across sectors and countries. Such reallocation is now even more important because the shock is structural and likely to persist. The emergency measures have been characterized by their national(istic) character. The subsidies put in place can address distortions, such as those due to imperfect capital markets that result in liquidity constraints, but they can also distort for distributional reasons or because uncoordinated reactions are inefficient. The response to a sudden dramatic crisis left little time to consider how they may hinder dynamic adjustment when some permanent reallocation is needed. It is now time to do so.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/EEAG-Policy-Brief-July-20 ... tructural-change.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:eeagre:v::y:2020:i::p:21-26

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in EEAG Report on the European Economy from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().