How Important are Pocketbook Voting, Social Preferences and Expressive Motives in Referenda?

Johannes Meya, Panu Poutvaara and Robert Schwager

CESifo Forum, 2021, vol. 22, issue 04, 31-37

Abstract: Economic models on voting usually assume that voters maximize their own material interests. Yet there is convincing evidence that people also tend to care about fairness and the common good. Furthermore, some voters may derive utility from the act of voting in a certain way, independent of whether their vote affects the actual outcome. To evaluate the importance of these motives, we studied voting in student referenda on whether to collectively purchase a public good, such as a regional train ticket. Most students voted in line with their pocketbook interests and reported that their own willingness to pay was more important in their vote choice than others’ willingness to pay.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/CESifo-forum-2021-4-m ... ves-in-Referenda.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ifofor:v:22:y:2021:i:04:p:31-37

Access Statistics for this article

CESifo Forum is currently edited by Chang Woon Nam

More articles in CESifo Forum from ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().