EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The accuracy of asymmetric GARCH model estimation

Amélie Charles and Olivier Darné

International Economics, 2019, issue 157, 179-202

Abstract: This paper reviews eight software packages when estimating asymmetric GARCH models (from their default option). We consider the numerical consistency of GJR-GARCH, TGARCH, EGARCH and APARCH estimations with Normal and Student distributions as well as out-of-sample forecasting accuracy, using the model confidence set procedure. We show that results are clearly software-dependent for both asymmetric volatility models, especially for the t-ratios. The out-of-sample forecast results show that the differences in estimating symmetric and asymmetric GARCH models imply slight differences in terms of forecast accuracy, not statistically significant, except in few cases from the QLIKE loss function. Further, the results indicate that the different specifications of the asymmetric GARCH-type models used by the different packages appear to have no significant effect on their forecast accuracy.

Keywords: EGARCH; GJR-GARCH; TARCH; APARCH; Accuracy; Forecasting; Software (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2110701718300611 (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: The accuracy of asymmetric GARCH model estimation (2019) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cii:cepiie:2019-q1-157-11

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Economics from CEPII research center Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:cii:cepiie:2019-q1-157-11