A Comment on "The Great Canadian Slump"
Charles Freedman () and
Canadian Journal of Economics, 1998, vol. 31, issue 3, 646-665
In this comment on Fortin (1996), the authors argue that the sluggishness in economic activity in Canada in the 1990s is better explained by a combination of factors than by monetary policy alone. They find that: (1) it is difficult to explain the sluggishness on the basis of the historical relationship between monetary conditions and real activity; (2) Fortin's evidence of downward nominal wage rigidity is seriously overstated; (3) there are several reasons why technological change may have had a larger impact on employment in Canada in the 1990s than in the United States; and (4) the build-up of government debt in the 1980s and 1990s was much more than a cyclical problem associated with monetary policy.
JEL-codes: E5 E52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (25) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://economics.ca/cgi/xms?jab=v31n3/07.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
Available to subscribers only. Alternative access through JSTOR and Ingenta.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cje:issued:v:31:y:1998:i:3:p:646-665
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Canadian Journal of Economics is currently edited by David Green
More articles in Canadian Journal of Economics from Canadian Economics Association Canadian Economics Association Prof. Steven Ambler, Secretary-Treasurer c/o Olivier Lebert, CEA/CJE/CPP Office C.P. 35006, 1221 Fleury Est Montréal, Québec, Canada H2C 3K4. Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Prof. Werner Antweiler ().