The Constitutionality of Federal Climate Change Legislation

Alastair R. Lucas and Jenette Yearsley
Additional contact information
Alastair R. Lucas: Faculty of Law, University of Calgary
Jenette Yearsley: AltaLink Calgary

SPP Research Papers, 2011, vol. 4, issue 15

Abstract: Over the last decade, the Canadian government has not managed to produce a comprehensive climate change statute and has failed to adequately consider the constitutional implications of doing so. The Clean Air Bill, an unsuccessful 2006 amendment to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), focused on carbon credit trading and a technology fund credit mechanism to permit certain emissions-heavy industries to mitigate their production of greenhouse gases. However, this bill would likely have infringed on provincial jurisdiction over electricity generation facilities, trumping any attempt to address greenhouse gas emissions beneath the rubric of criminal law. The present federal government’s proposed coal-fired electricity generation regulations are similarly flawed. This paper thoroughly analyzes both pieces of legislation from a constitutional standpoint, using a rich body of case law to offer policymakers invaluable guidance in properly framing legally sound emission reduction statutes.

Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016 ... matechangelegisl.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:clh:resear:v:4:y:2011:i:15

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in SPP Research Papers from The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bev Dahlby ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).