EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

VOTERS DECIDE. CLASSICAL MODELS OF ELECTORAL BEHAVIOR

Constantin Sasu and Marius Dangă ()
Additional contact information
Constantin Sasu: Universitatea „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Iași

Management Intercultural, 2015, issue 33, 71-80

Abstract: The decision to vote and choosing among the candidates is a extremely important one with repercussions on everyday life by determining, in global mode, its quality for the whole society. Therefore the whole process by which the voter decide becomes a central concern. In this paper we intend to locate the determinants of the vote decision in the electoral behavior classical theoretical models developed over time. After doing synthesis of classical schools of thought on electoral behavior we conclude that it has been made a journey through the mind, soul and cheek, as follows: the mind as reason in theory developed by Downs, soul as preferably for an actor in Campbell's theory, etc. and cheek as an expression of the impossibility of detachment from social groups to which we belong in Lazarsfeld's theory.

Keywords: Electorate; Political Campaign; Political Marketing; Voting Decision; Voting Models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 M31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/MI_33_10.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cmj:interc:y:2015:i:33:p:71-80

Access Statistics for this article

Management Intercultural is currently edited by Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence

More articles in Management Intercultural from Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Serghie Dan ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:cmj:interc:y:2015:i:33:p:71-80