EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

ASSESSING WELFARE STATES – RISK AND CAPABILITY OF TRUST

Narmin Baghirzade
Additional contact information
Narmin Baghirzade: The Károly Ihrig Doctoral School of Management and Business, University of Debrecen, Hungary

Law, Society & Organisations, 2020, issue 9 (2/2020), 87-93

Abstract: Is the welfare state efficient? Is it a resolution for problems associated with risk? While looking at high-level generalization, the opposite polarity can be seen on this topic: supporters and critiques. Nevertheless, both sides still need much more accurate empirical pieces of evidence. Moreover, using specific theoretical perspectives can help to obtain an accurate assessment of patterns for institutional analysis. In this paper, risk phenomenon will be assessed within welfare states and it will be analyzed how risk can be related to welfare policies and “trust”. The analysis cannot be limited solely to one field; economic, political, and social aspects also ought to be taken into consideration for further investigations. Nevertheless, in this paper, the concepts will only be analyzed in terms of economic factors.

Keywords: Welfare state; Risk; Trust (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/LSO_9_4.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cmj:lawsor:y:2020:i:9:p:87-93

Access Statistics for this article

Law, Society & Organisations is currently edited by Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence

More articles in Law, Society & Organisations from Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Serghie Dan ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:cmj:lawsor:y:2020:i:9:p:87-93