 The Social Perception of Judicial DecisionsAlbin Iglicar ()
DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 2011, issue 4, 1-17 Abstract: In addition to the main social function of the judiciary (solving conflicts), there are other important social tasks of the judiciary that can be summarised as solving conflicts, protecting the interests (rights) of individuals and general (state) interests, social control, the judiciary in the function of a homeostatic mechanism and achieving system legitimacy and control of the executive branch of power. The public’s perception of the judiciary and its confidence in the judicial system depends first and foremost on the public’s notions of the tasks and competencies of the judicial authorities as they are formed in public opinion. These notions and the related perception of the social functions of the judiciary are to a small extent formed on the basis of the individual personal experiences of participants in judicial proceedings and the experiences of others that these impart to their social environment. To a greater extent, the social perception and public opinion of the work of the courts depends on media reports, the appearances of politicians and the public appearances of representatives of the judiciary. Keywords: Public; Judicial Decisions; System Theory; Confidence in the Judiciary (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cmn:journl:y:2011:i:4:p:1-17 Access Statistics for this article More articles in DANUBE: Law and Economics Review from European Association Comenius - EACO |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.