Preliminary Ruling of the ECJ and the Akcenta Case

Katarína Kalesná ()
Additional contact information
Katarína Kalesná: Comenius University

DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 2018, issue 4, 261–267

Abstract: The article analyses the significance of the ECJ preliminary ruling on competition law. Starting with the general characteristic of the preliminary ruling of the Court of Justice, its legal regulation in TFEU and its effects, it focuses on the concrete judgement of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 February 2013 in Case C-68/12 at the request of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic. It explains the preliminary questions and the background of the competition case that was the incentive for them. It describes the quite complicated cartel agreement of the three banks concerned and the impact of the ECJ preliminary ruling on the judgements/decisions of the case.

Keywords: Preliminary Ruling/Questions; Agreement Restricting Competition; Cartel; Procedure; Competition Authority; National Court; European Court of Justice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.eaco.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/kalesna.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cmn:journl:y:2018:i:4:p:261-267

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in DANUBE: Law and Economics Review from European Association Comenius - EACO
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Helena Campbelle ().