Social Processes as Drivers for Empowerment of Sustainable Fisheries Management on Åland

Kristina Svels, Katrina Rønningen, Viktor Eriksson, Linda Sundström, Salina Spiering, Cecilie H. Bratt, Maiken Bjørkan, Brendan Murtagh and Wesley Flannery
Additional contact information
Kristina Svels: Natural Resources Institute Finland – Luke, Finland
Katrina Rønningen: Institute for Rural and Regional Research – Ruralis, Norway
Viktor Eriksson: Rörelse Viktor Eriksson, Finland
Linda Sundström: Fisheries Agency, Government of Åland, Finland
Salina Spiering: Nordland Research Institute, Norway
Cecilie H. Bratt: Digitale Helgeland, Norway
Maiken Bjørkan: Nordland Research Institute, Norway
Brendan Murtagh: School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast, UK
Wesley Flannery: School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast, UK

Ocean and Society, 2026, vol. 3

Abstract: This study analyses and evaluates an early-stage, pre-intervention phase in Åland’s small-scale fisheries community and examines the usefulness of a mixed-methods approach. It focuses on how combining three complementary methods supports the development of a grounded and legitimate pilot, rather than assessing pilot outcomes. The study applies a mixed-method approach combining a governance audit, community stakeholder workshops, and Q-methodology to map the social and institutional context prior to pilot implementation. The small-scale fisheries community in Åland represents an important cultural heritage and way of life, but faces increasing vulnerability due to regulatory pressures, ecological challenges, and socio-economic marginalisation. The findings suggest that combining multiple social science methods can contribute to a more nuanced understanding of stakeholder perspectives, power dynamics, and governance constraints, while supporting the identification of locally relevant intervention pathways and creating conditions for more legitimate and inclusive pilot development. However, the results also highlight limitations related to uneven participation and the difficulty of engaging diverse stakeholder groups in practice. The analysis indicates that social science approaches can provide an essential foundation for the later development of ecologically and socially grounded interventions, including nature-based solutions where locally appropriate. Nevertheless, social science contributions are currently less prominent than technical nature-based interventions, suggesting the value of more balanced integration between scientific disciplines in future initiatives. Overall, this article illustrates both the potential and the limits of mixed-method approaches in early-stage co-creation processes, offering insights for the design of participatory governance interventions in coastal communities.

Keywords: Åland; Finland; fisheries communities; governance audit; Q-method; small-scale fisheries; water ownership; workshop (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/oceanandsociety/article/view/12476 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:ocesoc:v3:y:2026:a:12476

DOI: 10.17645/oas.12476

Access Statistics for this article

Ocean and Society is currently edited by Fábio Vicente

More articles in Ocean and Society from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().