Integrating Manufacturing: Strategies and Legal Approaches Dealing With Noise Conflicts in German Urban Planning

Kerstin Meyer, Lars Sievers, Stefan Gärtner, Johanna Schoppengerd and Anne Söfker-Rieniets
Additional contact information
Kerstin Meyer: Institute for Work and Technology, Westphalian University for Applied Sciences, Germany / Working Group “Urban Manufacturing,” Academy for Territorial Development in the Leibniz Association (ARL), ARL‐Forum NRW, Germany
Lars Sievers: Working Group “Urban Manufacturing,” Academy for Territorial Development in the Leibniz Association (ARL), ARL‐Forum NRW, Germany / Department of Spatial Planning, TU Dortmund University, Germany
Stefan Gärtner: Institute for Work and Technology, Westphalian University for Applied Sciences, Germany / Working Group “Urban Manufacturing,” Academy for Territorial Development in the Leibniz Association (ARL), ARL‐Forum NRW, Germany
Johanna Schoppengerd: Working Group “Urban Manufacturing,” Academy for Territorial Development in the Leibniz Association (ARL), ARL‐Forum NRW, Germany / Osnabrück University of Applied Sciences, Germany
Anne Söfker-Rieniets: Working Group “Urban Manufacturing,” Academy for Territorial Development in the Leibniz Association (ARL), ARL‐Forum NRW, Germany / Faculty of Architecture, RWTH Aachen University, Germany

Urban Planning, 2025, vol. 10

Abstract: This article examines the integration of urban manufacturing into German urban land‐use planning, with a focus on mixed‐use strategies, legal approaches, and the role of court decisions in resolving conflicts related to noise. Building on the findings of a German working group of inter‐ and transdisciplinary experts on urban manufacturing, we explore planning strategies within the current legal framework to secure and promote urban manufacturing. The research analyses nine preparatory and 87 binding land‐use plans from 23 large German cities, alongside 15 court cases where companies contested municipal binding land‐use plans due to noise regulations. The findings reveal that zoning, frequently cited as a tool to protect urban manufacturing, can withstand judicial scrutiny. However, municipalities often fail to adequately address conflicts or comply with procedural requirements, particularly in noise management and immission control. The analysis highlights the potential for both coarse‐ and fine‐grained mixes of uses, suggesting that tailored zoning approaches can enable integration of residential and productive areas. Nevertheless, industrial gentrification remains a significant challenge, as preparatory and binding land‐use plans rarely address this issue. These findings contribute to the broader international discourse on sustainable and integrated urban areas, in line with contemporary urban development concepts such as the New Leipzig Charter. The article calls for further empirical research and advocates for stronger legal frameworks to support the coexistence of residential and manufacturing spaces.

Keywords: court decisions; industrial gentrification; land‐use planning; mix of uses; planning law; productive city; urban manufacturing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/9991 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:9991

DOI: 10.17645/up.9991

Access Statistics for this article

Urban Planning is currently edited by Tiago Cardoso

More articles in Urban Planning from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().