Conflict or Collaboration in the Management of Urban Green Areas: Activists vs. Decision‐Makers

Katarzyna Gorczyca, Daria Zozulia and Łukasz Fiedeń
Additional contact information
Katarzyna Gorczyca: Faculty of Geography and Geology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland
Daria Zozulia: Faculty of Geography and Geology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland / Doctoral School in the Social Sciences, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland
Łukasz Fiedeń: Faculty of Geography and Geology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland

Urban Planning, 2026, vol. 11

Abstract: Recent decades have been marked by a growing prominence of grassroots initiatives to protect urban green areas (UGAs), bringing into view a persistent divergence between activists and decision-makers in post-socialist cities undergoing socio-ecological transitions, in particular a tension between development pressure and the need to protect valuable UGAs. These conflicts are especially pronounced in contexts of internal suburbanisation, where peripheral green land is converted into development reserves faster than planning systems can respond. Using environmental justice (EJ) as the analytical framework, this study examines how grassroots activists challenge governance processes around UGA protection in Polish metropolitan areas: Warsaw, Kraków, Wrocław, and Gdynia (the Tricity). The research is based on a qualitative analysis of four case studies of local grassroots initiatives, drawing on in-depth interviews with activists, focus group interviews with decision-makers, and a review of planning documents. The findings show that conflicts over UGAs reflect compound environmental injustices across distributive, procedural, and recognitional dimensions, shaped by post-socialist planning legacies and suburbanisation pressure. Performative consultations and the marginalisation of community ecological knowledge recur as systemic rather than case-specific failures. Activist campaigns do produce results, but the gains are uneven: Green spaces get partially protected, yet the underlying procedural and recognitional injustices rarely get resolved. Rather than being integrated into governance, activists remain on the outside, compensating for gaps that formal planning systems and participation mechanisms leave unaddressed. The findings also suggest that spatial location, not only socio-economic position, functions as an independent axis of environmental marginalisation in post-socialist suburban contexts.

Keywords: environmental governance; environmental justice; environmental planning; grassroots movements; urban green areas (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/11924 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:urbpla:v11:y:2026:a:11924

DOI: 10.17645/up.11924

Access Statistics for this article

Urban Planning is currently edited by Tiago Cardoso

More articles in Urban Planning from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().