Planning in/for/with the Public

Ulf Strohmayer
Additional contact information
Ulf Strohmayer: School of Geography & Archaeology, The National University of Ireland, Ireland

Urban Planning, 2016, vol. 1, issue 1, 55-58

Abstract: This commentary traces key issues attaching to the use of the word ‘public’ within planning practices and theories. It argues for an alternative, non-binary engagement with public practices that may profit from being cast in a Foucauldian language and epistemology.

Keywords: alternative practices; dispositive; Foucauldian language; public sphere (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/599 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:urbpla:v1:y:2016:i:1:p:55-58

DOI: 10.17645/up.v1i1.599

Access Statistics for this article

Urban Planning is currently edited by Tiago Cardoso

More articles in Urban Planning from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().