Real vs. Virtual City: Planning Issues in a Discontinuous Urban Area in Budapest’s Inner City

Melinda Benkő, Bence Bene, Ádám Pirity, Árpád Szabó and Tamás Egedy
Additional contact information
Melinda Benkő: Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary
Bence Bene: Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary
Ádám Pirity: Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary
Árpád Szabó: Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary
Tamás Egedy: Budapest Business School, Faculty of Commerce, Hospitality and Tourism, University of Applied Sciences, Hungary / Geographical Institute of the Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Hungary

Urban Planning, 2021, vol. 6, issue 4, 150-163

Abstract:

The 21st century has brought fundamental changes in the development of cities, with the spread of ICT and the rise of digitalization. The new technologies are increasingly making their mark on urban planning and policy as well. The question of how contemporary urban planning is adapting to new challenges is particularly relevant as neighborhoods built in previous centuries and decades by traditional planning methods are now increasingly confronted with new public and environmental demands. Despite the bad reputation of Budapest’s 8th district, Józsefváros, based on the socio-economic and urban problems it has continuously faced in the past, the neighborhood has become one of the most dynamically developing urban areas in the last decade. From a planning point of view, an exciting area of the district is Szigony Street and its wider surroundings due to the strongly fragmented, heterogeneous urban fabric. Nevertheless, the only high-rise mass housing estate built in Budapest’s historic inner city in the 1960s and 1970s is located there. Our research used a complex methodology (document, content and database analysis, fieldwork, surveys with professionals, and interviews) to explore the planning history of the area’s development. Ultimately, the aim was to identify the most important outcomes and consequences of traditional and contemporary planning and design and whether modern digital planning can make a meaningful contribution to the development of the neighborhood. Our results show that urban planning and development in Budapest are still essentially based on traditional top-down approaches. Digitalization has a role to play primarily in visualization and contextualization but digitalizing of planning alone will not solve problems and past planning mistakes that affect the urban fabric of a neighborhood.

Keywords: Budapest; digitalization; ICT; Józsefváros; mass housing; real city; Szigony Street; urban development; urban planning; virtual city (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4446 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:urbpla:v6:y:2021:i:4:p:150-163

DOI: 10.17645/up.v6i4.4446

Access Statistics for this article

Urban Planning is currently edited by Tiago Cardoso

More articles in Urban Planning from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().