Self-Management of Housing and Urban Commons: New Belgrade and Reflections on Commons Today

Anica Dragutinovic, Uta Pottgiesser and Wido Quist
Additional contact information
Anica Dragutinovic: Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, TU Delft, The Netherlands / Institute for Design Strategies, OWL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Germany
Uta Pottgiesser: Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, TU Delft, The Netherlands / Institute for Design Strategies, OWL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Germany
Wido Quist: Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, TU Delft, The Netherlands

Urban Planning, 2022, vol. 7, issue 1, 267-279

Abstract: The concepts of collective management of housing and urban spaces are being revisited within the contemporary discussions about community-driven approaches and practices and, in particular, related to the revitalization of residential neighbourhoods. This research identifies the concepts of self-management and social ownership of housing in the post-World War II period in Yugoslavia as an important legacy of Yugoslav urban planning and housing policies. Although they were subsequently neglected, these concepts can contribute to contemporary global discussions about housing affordability and the role of community in ensuring spatial and social equality. New Belgrade mass housing blocks—the main site for testing the new dwelling concepts, in terms of both policies and modernist design—are the object of this research. The article is mainly a theoretical analysis of the issues of common interest and engagement, common good, and common spaces which played a decisive role in its design. The study applies interpretative and correlational research methods in re-theorizing these concepts and their underlying narratives. It traces how the perspectives on the collective practices and spaces evolved over time, revealing a correlation between changed social practices and the spatial deterioration of the New Belgrade mass housing blocks. The study highlights the importance of both collective practices and common spaces for addressing housing issues, emphasizing their instrumentality, and potentiality for rearticulating the dialogue between public and private, engaging citizens in interactive and inclusive decision-making and co-creation of the urban reality.

Keywords: common spaces; community; dwelling concepts; New Belgrade; post-war housing; self-management; urban commons (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4746 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:1:p:267-279

DOI: 10.17645/up.v7i1.4746

Access Statistics for this article

Urban Planning is currently edited by Tiago Cardoso

More articles in Urban Planning from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().