The Co-’s of Co-Living: How the Advertisement of Living Is Taking Over Housing Realities
Federico Coricelli
Additional contact information
Federico Coricelli: Future Urban Legacy Lab, Politecnico di Torino, Italy
Urban Planning, 2022, vol. 7, issue 1, 296-304
Abstract:
Co-living penetrated the urban realm both as a housing format and a neologism with fluid meaning. The co-living concept was developed by various companies in the early 2010s claiming to provide a valuable alternative to flat living in highly competitive rental markets. As a real estate product, co-living consists of all-inclusive rental plans of furnished rooms connected to fully equipped communal areas, conceived both for short-term and long-term stays. The few realized buildings combine collective spaces as laundries and co-working spaces with rooms as small as nine square meters. This kind of layout explicitly targets the urban middle-classer willing to live simultaneously together and apart . Differently from other housing formats, co-living is promoted through the jargon of sharing economy more than one of real-estate agencies. The co- root is commonly explained in companies’ recurring website section “What’s co-living?” as collective- living, convenient -living, and community -living. The emphasis on communitarian living echoes the semantics of co-housing. However, co-living communities differ radically from co-housing ones, based on a bottom-up initiative of inhabitants subscribing to a contract of cohabitation. In contrast, a co-living community is generated exclusively through economic accessibility. This article gives a critical insight into the mutated meanings of housing in the digital era by analysing co-living companies’ narratives and their spatial counterpart in realized buildings. The evidence collected by co-living promotion contributes to addressing a broader shift in real estate towards emphasizing the experiential dimension of lifestyle over space and shelter as primary housing features.
Keywords: co-living; housing; living; real estate (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4805 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:1:p:296-304
DOI: 10.17645/up.v7i1.4805
Access Statistics for this article
Urban Planning is currently edited by Tiago Cardoso
More articles in Urban Planning from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().