“Emancipatory Circuits of Knowledge” for Urban Equality: Experiences From Havana, Freetown, and Asia

Stephanie Butcher, Camila Cociña, Alexandre Apsan Frediani, Michele Acuto, Brenda Pérez‐Castro, Jorge Peña‐Díaz, Joiselen Cazanave‐Macías, Braima Koroma and Joseph Macarthy
Additional contact information
Stephanie Butcher: Melbourne Centre for Cities, University of Melbourne, Australia
Camila Cociña: The Bartlett Development Planning Unit, University College London, UK
Alexandre Apsan Frediani: International Institute for Environment and Development, UK
Michele Acuto: Melbourne Centre for Cities, University of Melbourne, Australia
Brenda Pérez‐Castro: Secretariat, Asian Coalition for Housing Rights, Thailand
Jorge Peña‐Díaz: Faculty of Architecture, Technological University José Antonio Echeverría (CUJAE), Cuba
Joiselen Cazanave‐Macías: Faculty of Architecture, Technological University José Antonio Echeverría (CUJAE), Cuba
Braima Koroma: Sierra Leone Urban Research Centre, Sierra Leone / Institute of Geography and Development Studies, Njala University, Sierra Leone
Joseph Macarthy: Sierra Leone Urban Research Centre, Sierra Leone / Institute of Geography and Development Studies, Njala University, Sierra Leone

Urban Planning, 2022, vol. 7, issue 3, 206-218

Abstract: Feminist, Southern, and decolonial thinkers have long argued that epistemological questions about how knowledge is produced and whose knowledge is valued and actioned are crucial in addressing inequalities, and a key challenge for planning. This collaborative article interrogates how knowledge is mobilised in urban planning and practice, discussing three experiences which have actively centred often-excluded voices, as a way of disrupting knowledge hierarchies in planning. We term these “emancipatory circuits of knowledge”—processes whereby diverse, situated, and marginalised forms of knowledge are co-produced and mobilised across urban research and planning, to address inequalities. We discuss experiences from the Technological University José Antonio Echeverría (CUJAE), a university in Havana, Cuba, that privileges a fluid and collaborative understanding of universities as social actors; the Sierra Leone Urban Research Centre, a research institute in the city of Freetown, which curates collective and inclusive spaces for community action planning, to challenge the legacies of colonial-era planning; and the Asian Coalition for Housing Rights, a regional network across Asia, which facilitates processes of exchange and co-learning which are highly strategic and situated in context, to advance community-led development. Shared across these “emancipatory circuits” are three “sites of impact” through which these partners have generated changes: encouraging inclusive policy and planning outcomes; shifting the planning praxis of authorities, bureaucrats, and researchers; and nurturing collective trajectories through building solidarities. Examining these three sites and their challenges, we query how urban knowledge is produced and translated towards epistemic justice, examining the tensions and the possibilities for building pathways to urban equality.

Keywords: Asia; co-production; epistemic justice; Freetown; Havana; knowledge translation; participation; planning; urban equality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5319 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:3:p:206-218

DOI: 10.17645/up.v7i3.5319

Access Statistics for this article

Urban Planning is currently edited by Tiago Cardoso

More articles in Urban Planning from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().