Does Opaqueness Make Equity Capital Expensive for Banks?
Revista de Economía del Rosario, 2016, vol. 17, issue 2, 203-227
Bank managers often claim that equity is expensive, which contradicts the Modigliani-Miller irrelevance theorem. An opaque bank must signal its solvency by paying high and stable dividens in order to keep depositors tranquil. This signalling may require costly liquidations if the return on assets has been poor, but not paying the dividend might trigger a run. A strongly capitalised bank should keep substantial amounts of risk-free yet non-productive currency because the number of shares is high, which is costly. The dividend is informative of the state of the bank; rational depositors react to it.
Keywords: dividends; bank capital; irrelevance theorem (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G21 G35 D82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:col:000151:014257
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Revista de Economía del Rosario from Universidad del Rosario
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Facultad de Economía ().