EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparison of Survey Expectations Series with Non Response and Various Weighting Schemes

Emilia Tomczyk () and Barbara Kowalczyk
Additional contact information
Barbara Kowalczyk: Warsaw School of Economics

Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici, Ekonomia, 2009, vol. 40, 249-258

Abstract: Expectations concerning key economic variables certainly influence decisions undertaken by economic agents. Since assumption of rationality forms the basis of neoclassical economic theory, question of whether expectations of industrial enterprises are indeed formed rationally deserves careful attention. In this paper, we analyze two basic properties of expectations rational in sense introduced by J. F. Muth – that is, unbiasedness and orthogonality – taking into account issue of non-response and weighting schemes. We find that rationality of expectations of Polish industrial firms is not sensitive to these factors. Independently from non-response and weighting issues, expectations concerning relative changes in production remain unbiased but not efficient with respect to freely available information.

Keywords: expectations; rationality; tendency surveys; survey data; qualitative data; non-response; weighting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpn:umkanc:2009:p:249-258

Access Statistics for this article

Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici, Ekonomia is currently edited by Mariola Pilatowska

More articles in Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici, Ekonomia from Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Miroslawa Buczynska ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:cpn:umkanc:2009:p:249-258