Does Heterodoxy Make an Historian of Economics Blind and Deaf?
Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy, 2002, issue 43, 93-102
This note replies to Michel De Vroey's article "The History of Economics as Seen by an HeterodoxEconomist", published in Cahiers d'economie politique nO 38. It disputes De Vroey's statement that my "heterodox" presupposition of the primacy of the wage relationship explains a presentation of Keynes blind on his errors and an evocation of "New classical" macroeconomics deaf to its achievements. Once the assumed heterodoxy is put aside, the analytical disagreement appears to turn on two issues: the possibility for a decline in the real wage to eliminate involuntary unemployment, and the fragility of the theoretical foundations of "New classical" macroeconomics.
JEL-codes: B10 B22 E12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpo:journl:y:2002:i:43:p:93-102
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
142 rue du faubourg Saint-Martin. 75010 Paris, France.
Access Statistics for this article
Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy is currently edited by Claire Pignol
More articles in Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy from L'Harmattan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Carlos Andrés Vasco Correa ().