Argumentative Invention and Public Debate - A Sociological Perspective on the Origin of Good Arguments
Francis Chateauraynaud ()
Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy, 2004, issue 47, 191-213
Analyzing how public debates affect social processes needs a critical reflection about the status given to argumentation by models in social sciences. This paper examines the conditions in which arguments could transform the positions of actors involved in a debate. The strength of an argument is not located in an underlying social struggle or in a pure logical space. It depends on the links it produces between three types of constraints: the set of tangible evidences which are used by actors; the compatibility of different representations and interests in a common computational space; at last, new ways of thinking the relationships between past, present and future. Then, debates appear like moments of invention of new argumentative features that are able to resist against critical variations. When the invention of argumentation can be developed, public debates are producing a new common sense for the actors.
JEL-codes: A12 B40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpo:journl:y:2004:i:47:p:191-213
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
142 rue du faubourg Saint-Martin. 75010 Paris, France.
Access Statistics for this article
Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy is currently edited by Claire Pignol
More articles in Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy from L'Harmattan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Carlos Andrés Vasco Correa ().