Hayek and Rawls about social justice: are the differences "more verbal than substantial"?
Claude Gamel ()
Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy, 2008, issue 54, 85-120
Hayek (theoretician of "the mirage of social justice") seems to be completely opposed to Rawls (author of "Theory of justice"), but the economist can have written that the differences between himself and the philosopher are "more verbal than substantial". In spite of opposed paradigms (evolutionism versus contractualism), the stages are quite comparable in the setting of norms (anti-utilitarianism, impartiality, experimentation) and induce two versions of the same conception of justice in society, through the content and the hierarchy of norms the two authors put forward (priority of liberty, fair increase of opportunity for everyone, better condition for the poorest people).
JEL-codes: B25 D63 I38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpo:journl:y:2008:i:54:p:85-120
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
142 rue du faubourg Saint-Martin. 75010 Paris, France.
Access Statistics for this article
Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy is currently edited by Claire Pignol
More articles in Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy from L'Harmattan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Carlos Andrés Vasco Correa ().