EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

General Equilibrium and Social Justice: Neoclassical Theory as a Political Philosophy?

Vincent Desreumaux ()

Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy, 2013, issue 64, 75-110

Abstract: We study the willingness of some authors, including H. Varian in the 70’s, to elaborate a theory of justice that would fit standard general equilibrium theory in its Pareto’s canonical version. We first show, through an analysis of market socialism in the 30’s, that the Paretian ethic is based on the value judgment of consumer sovereignty. Then we are able to discuss the specific contribution of Varian, who, by introducing the criterion of equity as envy-freeness, produces a – very specific – theory of justice that seems compatible with this value judgment and can stand at the heart of standard general equilibrium analysis.

Keywords: Pareto; Social Justice; welfare economics; market socialism; envy freeness; political philosophy. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B13 B20 B40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cairn.info/revue-cahiers-d-economie-politique.htm (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpo:journl:y:2013:i:64:p:75-110

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
142 rue du faubourg Saint-Martin. 75010 Paris, France.

Access Statistics for this article

Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy is currently edited by Claire Pignol

More articles in Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy from L'Harmattan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Carlos Andrés Vasco Correa ().

 
Page updated 2023-02-25
Handle: RePEc:cpo:journl:y:2013:i:64:p:75-110