On modesty and combativeness in economic philosophy
Egidius Berns ()
Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy, 2013, issue 65, 227-239
In this contribution I question the expression “economical philosophy” as an association of opposed terms which cannot be defined without referring to each other beforehand. Because of this original intertwining of philosophy and economics, philosophical reason is as bounded as economical reason and therefore unable to determine the place of the economy within the social totality. Therefore, the expression can only be understood as a double bind of modesty and combativeness. Modesty because the philosopher is unable to provide a foundation for the work of the economist, who is henceforth in charge to look for his own foundations. Combativeness because the work of the economist is always already contaminated by claims about the social totality and therefore subject for philosophical critique. In order to express this double bind, it is better to use the expressions “philosophy and economics” or “philosophy of economics”.
Keywords: economic philosophy; practical reason; rationality; chrematistic. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A12 B00 B41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpo:journl:y:2013:i:65:p:227-239
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
142 rue du faubourg Saint-Martin. 75010 Paris, France.
Access Statistics for this article
Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy is currently edited by Claire Pignol
More articles in Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy from L'Harmattan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Carlos Andrés Vasco Correa ().