The Unconvincing Case for Drug Testing

Lennart E. Henriksson

Canadian Public Policy, 1991, vol. 17, issue 2, 183-196

Abstract: The Mulroney government has recently proposed a program of mandatory drug testing in Canada's transportation industries. Following a brief discussion of drug testing in Canada, the paper reviews the relevant literature and describes the necessary components of conducting a cost-benefit analysis. It will be seen that this literature does not provide persuasive evidence of the usefulness of drug testing in addressing illicit drug problems in the workplace. The final section of the paper explores the legal environment surrounding drug testing, as it is reflected by constitutional statute and case law, as well as the work of legal scholars, and other writers. Special attention is given to the privacy issue which underlies many of the legal challenges to testing programs in the United States. The paper concludes that much more remains to be learned about the efficacy and consequences of drug testing programs before widespread Canadian applications can be endorsed.

Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%2819910 ... UCFDT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-4 (text/html)
only available to JSTOR subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpp:issued:v:17:y:1991:i:2:p:183-196

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.utpjournals.com/loi/cpp/

Access Statistics for this article

Canadian Public Policy is currently edited by Prof. Mike Veall

More articles in Canadian Public Policy from University of Toronto Press University of Toronto Press Journals Division 5201 Dufferin Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3H 5T8.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Iver Chong ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).