 Third-Party Advertising and Electoral Democracy: The Political Theory of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Somerville v. Canada (Attorney General) [1996]Herman Bakvis and Jennifer Smith Canadian Public Policy, 1997, vol. 23, issue 2, 164-178 Abstract: As the decision in Somerville v. Canada (Attorney General) [1996] indicates, the courts are continuing to prove hostile to the restrictions on third-party or independent spending that are set out in the Canada Elections Act. The difficulty is that these restrictions are part of a larger election-expenses regime that is designed to encourage fairness in the electoral competition between parties and candidates. Through an examination of the Somerville case, this paper argues that if the restrictions on third-party spending are eliminated, then the restrictions on parties and candidates are sure to fall as well, and Canadian elections will come to resemble an unregulated, free-for-all. Ironically, under these conditions the position of political parties may well be strengthened in relation to interest groups as the latter become conduits for campaign finance rather than active and visable participants in the electoral process. Date: 1997 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpp:issued:v:23:y:1997:i:2:p:164-178 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Canadian Public Policy is currently edited by Prof. Mike Veall More articles in Canadian Public Policy from University of Toronto Press University of Toronto Press Journals Division 5201 Dufferin Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3H 5T8. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.