US Labour Market Policy and the Canada-US Unemployment Rate Gap

David Andolfattio, Paul Gomme and Paul Storer
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: David Andolfatto ()

Canadian Public Policy, 1998, vol. 24, issue s1, 210-232

Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the extent to which changes in US labour market policy in the 1980s may have contributed to the emergence of an unemployment rate gap between Canada and the United States. In that decade, unemployment insurance benefits became taxable, income tax rates fell substantially, and various administrative changes were made that effectively tightened unemployment insurance eligibility requirements. These policy changes are evaluated in the context of a computable equilibrium model of the labour market. Our estimates suggest that all of these reforms together can account for no more than a 0.4 percentage point decline in the US natural rate of unemployment; a combined effect which accounts for 20 percent of the unemployment rate gap.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%2819980 ... LMPAT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-M (text/html)
only available to JSTOR subscribers

Related works:
Working Paper: U.S. Labour Market Policy and the Canada-U.S. Unemployment Rate Gap (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpp:issued:v:24:y:1998:i:s1:p:210-232

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.utpjournals.com/loi/cpp/

Access Statistics for this article

Canadian Public Policy is currently edited by Prof. Mike Veall

More articles in Canadian Public Policy from University of Toronto Press University of Toronto Press Journals Division 5201 Dufferin Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3H 5T8.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Iver Chong ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).