Standardized Mortality Ratios and Canadian Health-Care Funding

Kelly Bedard (), John Dorland, Allan Gregory and Mark Rosenberg

Canadian Public Policy, 1999, vol. 25, issue 1, 47-64

Abstract: Needs-based capitation models have been suggested as an alternative to health-care funding methods based on historical utilization patterns. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) applied in conjunction with an age/gender adjustment is the most widely adopted measure of relative need. This paper addresses a number of important index construction issues using Canadian data and discusses their health policy implications. These include the influence exerted by the age structure (excluding people over 64 versus 74), the optimal period over which to average the SMR in order to smooth meaningless fluctuations, and the correspondence between SMRs, standard socioeconomic indicators (i.e., unemployment, education, and income) health-care "need," and expenditures.

Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%2819990 ... MRACH%3E2.0.CO%3B2-A (text/html)
only available to JSTOR subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpp:issued:v:25:y:1999:i:1:p:47-64

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.utpjournals.com/loi/cpp/

Access Statistics for this article

Canadian Public Policy is currently edited by Prof. Mike Veall

More articles in Canadian Public Policy from University of Toronto Press University of Toronto Press Journals Division 5201 Dufferin Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3H 5T8.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Iver Chong ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).