Canadian Retirement Savings Plans and the Foreign Property Rule

David Burgess and Joel Fried

Canadian Public Policy, 1999, vol. 25, issue 3, 395-416

Abstract: This paper argues that the Foreign Property Rule (FPR), which limits the foreign content of a Registered Savings Plan to no more than 20 percent of book value, should be removed as quickly as possible. Given the globalization of financial markets, the FPR does not protect what it is meant to protect - a pool of savings for investment in Canada. Instead, it distorts the allocation of credit among firms, and forces agents to use more costly instruments - derivatives - to achieve desired foreign risk exposure. Since the FPR lowers the return on registered savings without benefiting any identifiable group, removing it would be an unequivocal gain to Canadians.

Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%2819990 ... RSPAT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-J (text/html)
only available to JSTOR subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpp:issued:v:25:y:1999:i:3:p:395-416

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.utpjournals.com/loi/cpp/

Access Statistics for this article

Canadian Public Policy is currently edited by Prof. Mike Veall

More articles in Canadian Public Policy from University of Toronto Press University of Toronto Press Journals Division 5201 Dufferin Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3H 5T8.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Iver Chong ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).