Government Revenue Stabilization Funds: Do They Make Us Better Off?
Stuart Landon () and
Constance Smith ()
Canadian Public Policy, 2013, vol. 39, issue 1, 71-99
Alberta government resource revenues are highly volatile. Adjustment of government spending to shifts in revenues imposes social and economic costs. Using simulations, we find the establishment in the early 1970s of a rule-based Alberta government resource revenue stabilization fund could have reduced revenue volatility and increased welfare. With the best performing fund, 50 percent of natural resource revenues are deposited in the fund each year and 25 percent of the assets are withdrawn. Not all fund types increase welfare. Funds that accumulate large asset stocks yield low welfare, as do funds that base expenditure on a simple moving average of past revenues.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
access restricted to subscribers
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpp:issued:v:39:y:2013:i:1:p:71-99
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Canadian Public Policy is currently edited by Prof. Mike Veall
More articles in Canadian Public Policy from University of Toronto Press University of Toronto Press Journals Division 5201 Dufferin Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3H 5T8.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Prof. Werner Antweiler ().