Gender-Based Analysis Plus in Canada: Problems and Possibilities of Integrating Intersectionality
Olena Hankivsky and
Linda Mussell
Canadian Public Policy, 2018, vol. 44, issue 4, 303-316
Abstract:
International debate is ongoing regarding the innovation of gender mainstreaming (GM), its efficacy, and future utility. Likewise, in Canada, there is a push to learn from early GM efforts and a renewed focus on creating more responsive mainstreaming strategies. Although Canada's gender-based analysis (GBA) has been researched and evaluated, this study uses the feminist theory of intersectionality to examine the newer GBA+ model, which builds on its predecessor. Drawing on thematic analysis of 32 stakeholder interviews from three different sectors and content analysis of key policy reports, we investigate how the shift to this new model is perceived, whether inclusion of the "+" results in greater responsiveness, and how to better operationalize intersectionality in policy contexts.
Keywords: GBA+; gender mainstreaming; Canada; intersectionality; public policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2017-058 (text/html)
access restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpp:issued:v:44:y:2018:i:4:p:303-316
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.utpjournals.com/loi/cpp/
Access Statistics for this article
Canadian Public Policy is currently edited by Prof. Mike Veall
More articles in Canadian Public Policy from University of Toronto Press University of Toronto Press Journals Division 5201 Dufferin Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3H 5T8.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Iver Chong ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).