Policy Forum: Piecemeal Tax Reform Ideas for Canada--Lessons from Principles and Practice

Robin Boadway

Canadian Tax Journal, 2014, vol. 62, issue 4, 1029-1059

Abstract: The basic structure of the Canadian personal and corporate tax system is informed by principles that were prevalent at the time of the Carter report. These principles include taxation based on the ability to pay, which supports comprehensive income taxation as the ideal base, accompanied by a corporate tax designed to withhold shareholders' income at source to prevent unlimited sheltering within corporations. Various piecemeal reforms have occurred since then, many of which move the base toward personal consumption. Yet, vestiges of the comprehensive income approach remain, such as a single-rate structure and a corporate tax base that is meant to reflect shareholder income. Ideas about optimal tax design and economic circumstances have evolved considerably since the Carter report. Initially, comprehensive income as an ideal base was challenged by progressive consumption taxation. This was later supplanted by an approach that emphasized individual well-being or welfarism. This in turn has recently been challenged by equality-of-opportunity ideas, which emphasize the opportunities that taxpayers enjoy, rather than the outcomes that they achieve. Additionally, the corporate tax has increasingly come to be seen as a device for taxing corporate rents, rather than for withholding shareholders' income at source. The author recounts the literature that has informed these changes and some of the practices that have emerged in other countries. Key elements of the literature include recent tax reform commissions in the United Kingdom, the United States, and Australia, each of which has relevance for Canada. Innovative practices include the dual income tax systems introduced in the Nordic countries and rent tax systems, such as the allowance for corporate equity and the resource rent tax. The author draws on these ideas and practices to offer some recommendations for tax reform in Canada.

Keywords: Carter commission; tax policy; tax reform; individual income taxes; corporate income taxes; progressive taxes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2014CTJ4.aspx (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ctf:journl:v:62:y:2014:i:4:p:1029-1059

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Canadian Tax Foundation, 145 Wellington Street West, Suite 1400, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 1H8
https://www.ctf.ca/E ... ns_ListingBooks.aspx

Access Statistics for this article

Canadian Tax Journal is currently edited by Kim Brooks, Kevin Milligan, and Daniel Sandler

More articles in Canadian Tax Journal from Canadian Tax Foundation Canadian Tax Foundation, 145 Wellington Street West, Suite 1400, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 1H8.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jim Lyons ().