Policy Forum: Sailing Beyond the Sunset? Are De Jure Control and Other Bright-Line Tests Relevant After Deans Knight and the New GAAR?

David Ross ()
Additional contact information
David Ross: Faculty of Law, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, British Columbia

Canadian Tax Journal, 2024, vol. 72, issue 3, 635-647

Abstract: This article takes readers on a voyage through the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Deans Knight Income Corp. v. Canada and subsequent cases that apply its interpretation of the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR). The author draws on metaphors from Greek philosophy and sailing to aid—and lighten—the discussion of the immortality of corporations, bright lines, and the Income Tax Act. The author argues that the majority of the Supreme Court in Deans Knight committed a "purpose error": in applying GAAR, the majority overemphasized subsection 111(5)'s primary purpose of stopping corporate loss trading at the expense of the legislation's other purposes, including providing certainty to public companies with high shareholder turnover. Future cases decided under the amended GAAR may be even more vulnerable to a purpose error. The author then considers whether other bright-line tests in the Act are vulnerable to the same sort of purpose error if GAAR is applied. For example, he examines whether the 30-day time limit in the Act's stop-loss rules could be abused by waiting an extra day to comply with the rule, whether waiting one more day to sell a house could abuse the "flipped property" rules in subsections 12(12) to (14), and whether buying one more share to meet an ownership threshold could abuse part IV or section 113. While each of those strategies could arguably be abusive under the approach taken in Deans Knight , it would be an error to always interpret the rules so broadly. Courts should consider Parliament's purpose in using a bright-line test before applying GAAR, and ask how arbitrary and potentially manipulable the line is.

Keywords: GAAR; statutory interpretation; loss-restriction event; stop-loss rules; foreign affiliate rules; public companies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2024CTJ3.aspx (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ctf:journl:v:72:y:2024:i:3:p:635-647

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Canadian Tax Foundation, 145 Wellington Street West, Suite 1400, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 1H8
https://www.ctf.ca/E ... ns_ListingBooks.aspx

DOI: 10.32721/ctj.2024.72.3.pf.ross

Access Statistics for this article

Canadian Tax Journal is currently edited by Kim Brooks, Kevin Milligan, and Daniel Sandler

More articles in Canadian Tax Journal from Canadian Tax Foundation Canadian Tax Foundation, 145 Wellington Street West, Suite 1400, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 1H8.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jim Lyons ().