Proportionality, Justice, and the Value-Added Tax

Charles W. Baird
Additional contact information
Charles W. Baird: California State University at Hayward

Cato Journal, 1981, vol. 1, issue 2, 405-420

Abstract: This paper has two purposes: to establish that the most frequently proposed form of value-added tax is really a proportional income tax rather than, as it is popularly seen, an inflationary, regressive sales tax; and to propose that this value-added tax be adopted as an alternative to all existing federal personal and corporate income, as well as federal employment and excise, taxes. Of course, to make such a proposal in light of the government’s propensity to simply add any new tax on top of existing taxes is risky. Nevertheless, the nature of the value-added tax and the argument that it is superior to existing taxes stand apart from the danger that the government will merely add it on to present taxes, I don’t believe we should refrain from identifying a superior taxing plan merely because politicians might treat it as a supplement rather than an alternative...

Keywords: taxation; income tax; value-added tax; government; progressive taxation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1981
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/f ... /1981/11/cj1n2-5.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cto:journl:v:1:y:1981:i:2:p:405-420

Access Statistics for this article

Cato Journal is currently edited by James A. Dorn

More articles in Cato Journal from Cato Journal, Cato Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emily Ekins ().