Choosing between Up-or-Out and Spot Contracts: Human Capital Investment versus Job-Matching Considerations
Chun Chang and
Yijiang Wang
Annals of Economics and Finance, 2000, vol. 1, issue 1, 189-210
Abstract:
Up-or-out contracts can improve human capital investment incentives but lead to suboptimal worker-employer separation. When job matching uncertainty is large relative to the return to human capital investment, spot contracts Pareto dominate up-or-out contracts. Otherwise, up-or-out contracts are more efficient. This view seems consistent with contractual choices in many different situations including those for university appointments with different emphases on research and teaching. The model also shows that human capital investment can be positively correlated with turnover under the up-or-out contract, a prediction different from that of the traditional human capital theory but consistent with casual observations of university professors' experiences. The result shows that the relationship between human capital investment and labor turnover should be understood in the context of a chosen contractual form.
Keywords: Contract; Human capital; Labor (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J24 J63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://aeconf.com/Articles/May2000/aef010110.pdf (application/pdf)
http://down.aefweb.net/AefArticles/aef010110.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cuf:journl:y:2000:v:1:i:1:p:189-210
Access Statistics for this article
Annals of Economics and Finance is currently edited by Heng-fu Zou
More articles in Annals of Economics and Finance from Society for AEF Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Qiang Gao ().