Credibility in the Regression case Revisited (A Late Tribute to Charles A. Hachemeister)

H. Bühlmann and A. Gisler

ASTIN Bulletin, 1997, vol. 27, issue 1, 83-98

Abstract: Many authors have observed that Hachemeisters Regression Model for Credibility – if applied to simple linear regression – leads to unsatisfactory credibility matrices: they typically ‘mix up’ the regression parameters and in particular lead to regression lines that seem ‘out of range’ compared with both individual and collective regression lines. We propose to amend these shortcomings by an appropriate definition of the regression parameters: –intercept –slope Contrary to standard practice the intercept should however not be defined as the value at time zero but as the value of the regression line at the barycenter of time. With these definitions regression parameters which are uncorrected in the collective can be estimated separately by standard one dimensional credibility techniques. A similar convenient reparametrization can also be achieved in the general regression case. The good choice for the regression parameters is such as to turn the design matrix into an array with orthogonal columns.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:astinb:v:27:y:1997:i:01:p:83-98_01

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in ASTIN Bulletin from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().