COVARIANCE-BASED ORTHOGONALITY TESTS FOR REGRESSORS WITH UNKNOWN PERSISTENCE

Alex Maynard and Katsumi Shimotsu

Econometric Theory, 2009, vol. 25, issue 1, 63-116

Abstract: This paper develops a new test of orthogonality based on a zero restriction on the covariance between the dependent variable and the predictor. The test provides a useful alternative to regression-based tests when conditioning variables have roots close or equal to unity. In this case standard predictive regression tests can suffer from well-documented size distortion. Moreover, under the alternative hypothesis, they force the dependent variable to share the same order of integration as the predictor, whereas in practice the dependent variable often appears stationary and the predictor may be near-nonstationary. By contrast, the new test does not enforce the same orders of integration and is therefore capable of detecting a rich set of alternatives to orthogonality that are excluded by the standard predictive regression model. Moreover, the test statistic has a standard normal limit distribution for both unit root and local-to-unity conditioning variables, without prior knowledge of the local-to-unity parameter. If the conditioning variable is stationary, the test remains conservative and consistent. Simulations suggest good small-sample performance. As an empirical application, we test for the predictability of stock returns using two persistent predictors, the dividend-price ratio and short-term interest rate.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Covariance-based Orthogonality Tests For Regressors With Unknown Persistence (2007)
Working Paper: Covariance-based orthogonality tests for regressors with unknown persistence (2004)
Working Paper: Covariance-based orthogonality tests for regressors with unknown persistence (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:etheor:v:25:y:2009:i:01:p:63-116_09

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Econometric Theory from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().