EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Adding Risks: Samuelson's Fallacy of Large Numbers Revisited

Stephen Ross

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1999, vol. 34, issue 03, 323-339

Abstract: Samuelson called accepting a sequence of independent positive mean bets that are individually unacceptable a fallacy of large numbers, and subsequent researchers have extended Samuelson's condition on utility functions to assure that they would not allow this fallacy. By contrast, some behavioralists, arguing the merits of diversification, believe that it is simply wrong headed to refuse a long series of independent “good” bets out of a misguided faith in expected utility theory. Contrary to what one might infer from the literature, this paper shows that accepting sequences of good bets is both consistent with expected utility theory and quite usual.

Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0022109000001204 link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:34:y:1999:i:03:p:323-339_00

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Keith Waters ().

 
Page updated 2019-04-15
Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:34:y:1999:i:03:p:323-339_00