Opening and Closing the Market: Evidence from the London Stock Exchange
Andrew Ellul,
Hyun Song Shin and
Ian Tonks
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2005, vol. 40, issue 4, 779-801
Abstract:
We investigate the performance of call markets at the open and close using a unique natural experiment provided by the London Stock Exchange where traders can choose between a call and an off-exchange dealership system. Although the call market dominates dealers in terms of price discovery, it suffers from a high failure rate to open and close trading especially when trading conditions are difficult. The call's trading costs increase with asymmetric information, slow trading, order flow imbalances, and uncertainty. Traders' resort to use of call auctions is negatively correlated with firm size, implying that the call may not be the optimal method for opening and closing trading of medium and small sized stocks.
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (35)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)
Related works:
Working Paper: Opening and closing the market: evidence from the London Stock Exchange (2004) 
Working Paper: Opening and Closing the Market: Evidence from the London Stock Exchange (2004) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:40:y:2005:i:04:p:779-801_00
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().