EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

SCHUMPETER VS. KEYNES: “IN THE LONG RUN NOT ALL OF US ARE DEAD”

Arthur Diamond ()

Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2009, vol. 31, issue 04, 531-541

Abstract: Keynes was viewed by himself, Schumpeter, and most others as the most highly esteemed economist of the twentieth century. However, Schumpeter is receiving increasing attention from mainstream economists. A few specific examples are discussed, and the citation time series for Keynes and Schumpeter are compared for the period 1956 through 2006. Generally, Keynes receives more citations than Schumpeter from 1956 through roughly the mid-1990s. But subsequently until 2006, Schumpeter received more citations than Keynes.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1053837209990307 link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:31:y:2009:i:04:p:531-541_99

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of the History of Economic Thought from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Keith Waters ().

 
Page updated 2019-05-18
Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:31:y:2009:i:04:p:531-541_99