IS LABOR'S LOSS CAPITAL'S GAIN? GROSS VERSUS NET LABOR SHARES
Benjamin Bridgman ()
Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2018, vol. 22, issue 8, 2070-2087
US labor share has been falling since the 1970s. I show that it has not fallen as much once items that do not add to capital, depreciation and production taxes, are netted out. Recent net labor share is within its historical range, whereas gross share is at its lowest level. This effect holds for other high-income economies. The overall picture is no longer one of unprecedented, globally declining labor share. Using gross share as a proxy for net share can give misleading results. US gross share and inequality are correlated, whereas net share, the correct measure, is not.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (34) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)
Working Paper: Is Labor's Loss Capital's Gain? Gross versus Net Labor Shares (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:22:y:2018:i:08:p:2070-2087_00
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Macroeconomic Dynamics from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Keith Waters ().